Co-creation, not “the core”
— Resolution comes from the
crowd:
play
three alternatives (BEFORE/AFTER films in 3D View), then ballot.
We invert Brynjolfsson & McAfee’s “the core”: hospital stakeholders co-resolve via weighted majority.
In Bason’s public-design frame, stakeholders co-create by prototyping scenarios — here, three playable alternatives.
1. Review 3 alternatives
2. Play BEFORE/AFTER films
3. Crowd votes (weighted)
4. Close → majority becomes rule
Machine, Platform, Crowd (Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2017) —
Norton.
Bason,
Leading Public Design (2017) —
Policy Press;
earlier:
Leading Public Sector Innovation —
2nd ed.
· Hybrid intelligence: Correia et al. (2023) —
DOI /
MDPI
· OpenSpec
OS-AO-003.
Consequence board — choice vs the larger whole
Side-by-side simulation deltas before you cast votes. Compare expected impact of each alternative vs baseline.
Closing the ballot applies the weighted-majority winner as the resolved operational rule for this hospital site.
The larger whole = site fleet and tasks sharing doors, elevators, and zones — your vote shapes that shared rule, not only a local preference.
Crowd ballot — pick the resolution
Not a single expert (“the core”) deciding — set weights across the three alternatives, cast your crowd vote, then close on weighted majority.